I Have No Mouth, and I Must Scream Response

I can't believe that whole story was only nine pages long. There's so much content in this story that could've lent itself to a much longer runtime. The whole plot is very one-note, which isn't a bad thing. Limitation is often the best way of creating, after all.

Now onto the actual story. It wasn't as weird as I originally thought. It's basically like Saw except the "mastermind" is a sentient computer. A lot of concepts in this story are also interesting: immortality, transfiguration, the world itself. Sci-Fi is great at building worlds, so I'm not surprised.

One of the themes of this story is the ability of sentience. One of the characters, Ted, has a dream about if AM had legs and other human desires. Ted concludes that AM has such a grudge on humanity because he was created to be just as sentient as humans. But one thing AM can't do is be creative (or in other words, I believe he means have passions like cooking, woodworking, be an artist, etc.). If you think about it, that is a big thing that sets us apart from animals. Animals aren't cognitive enough to know what their passions are. I feel bad for AM in that regard. You're a robot who can think and reason exactly like humans, but you just exist. You can't figure out what you're passionate about.

I'm not exactly sure how to translate that theme to our world, but it's still an interesting thought to have in your mind. It's more a question of philosophy, psychology, and existentialism. Things I think about almost every day. This is a good story for me. I highly recommend you read this (and it's short too)!

Comments

  1. Katey StareNovember 19, 2019 at 10:58 AM

    Great post! You made some very interesting points in your blog post.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Magicians Response

Just like Harry Potter  (in many ways), The Magicians  is about a group of magically inclined kids attending a school of magic. They learn how to harness their powers and have a relatively uneventful life. But one mistake leads them down a path that only they can control and fix. It's their responsibility. Both series deal with the weight and stress of having a huge responsibility quite well, in an exciting way too. For Harry, it's Voldemort. And for Quentin (the main character), it's the Beast. I haven't read any of the Harry Potter novels and I've only seen one of the movies, but I wonder if Harry actually sets the conflict in motion. I vaguely remember that Voldemort wanted to kill Harry as a baby because he was a Chosen One. But what The Magicians does that I think is a little more engaging is Quentin physically sets the antagonist loose within  the story. Therefore Quentin's responsibility to defeat the Beast is stronger and more intense than it is Harry&
Read more

The Ocean at the End of the Lane Response

I don't believe there is a myth associated with The Ocean at the End of the Lane . All of the strange occurrences in the book seem to be just unique and don't relate to anything. That was my first impression anyway. It may seem like an out-there comparison, but the Hunger Birds remind me of the locusts that Moses summons in the Bible. Mainly for the comparison between what they do to the people they attack. The locusts eat everything the Egyptians have, and the Hunger Birds completely eat Ursula and eat the Protagonist's heart. The lake, or in this case a portal to some other world, may be a sort of mythical place. It's explained that the Ocean is another world. That's where they dump Lettie when she sacrifices herself to save the Protagonist, after all. Maybe if the Ocean is like Narnia, I could see how this aspect ties into a certain myth. But really I got the impression that everything wasn't mythical. But I also can't really call this story a "
Read more